Skip to main content

The secrets of Google's search algorithms revealed

What's in the 2,500 Secret Google Documents Stolen and Ended Up Online

Recently, over 2,500 confidential Google documents were stolen and spread across the Internet, sparking widespread public debate. The material published is rich in technical details and reveals information that could transform the entire landscape of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and digital marketing.

The Heart of the News Leak

Erfan Azimi, an American computer scientist, claimed responsibility for stealing and leaking the documents in a YouTube video, saying Google had misled the public for decades about how its algorithms worked. According to the documents, Google manipulated the truth about how certain sites are ranked in search results, especially during critical periods such as elections.

Technical Details Revealed

The documents stolen from Google shed light on the inner workings of the algorithms that determine the ranking of websites in search results. Here are some technical aspects that have been highlighted:

Content Quality Signals: Google's algorithms appear to prioritize shorter, higher-quality content, a surprising revelation given that the prevailing trend among SEOs has been to promote long, detailed content.
Big Business Score: The documents indicate that Google may favor content produced by big companies. This aligns with the observation that more established brands tend to dominate the top spots in search results.
Use of Chrome Data: One of the most significant revelations is that Google may be using data collected through the Chrome browser to influence rankings. This suggests that users' navigation and interactions with sites could have a direct impact on search results.
Importance of Author and Brand Authority: The documents highlight the importance of author and brand authority in the ranking algorithm. This could mean that an author or brand's offline reputation plays a significant role in determining how their content is ranked online.
SEO Secrets Revealed

The leak also exposed some of the SEO strategies that Google has apparently used that contradict previous public claims:

Influence of User Clicks: Contrary to what was previously stated, it appears that the volume of clicks on a website still influences its ranking. This indicates that engagement metrics such as time spent on site and bounce rate may be more influential than Google has publicly admitted.
Treatment of Subdomains and Sandboxing: The documents deny that subdomains are treated separately with regards to ranking, and even the existence of a “sandbox” for new sites, contrary to what many SEO specialists had assumed.
Domain Age: Confirmation that the age of a domain is not collected or taken into account contradicts prevailing SEO theories that suggest that older domains are viewed favorably by Google's algorithms.
Implications for the Future of SEO

These revelations will force SEO professionals to reconsider many current best practices. In particular, the emphasis may shift more towards optimization based on real performance data rather than traditional assumptions. SEOs will also need to consider the potential influence of user behavioral data collected by Chrome and other Google tools.

Google's response

Google confirmed the authenticity of the documents, but warned against misinterpretations based on out-of-context, outdated or incomplete information. The company claims to periodically update its algorithms to adapt to changes in the web and user needs.


The emergence of these documents represents a potentially revolutionary moment for the online search industry. We will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates as new details emerge.

The case of the stolen Google documents demonstrates the importance of transparency and honesty in technological processes that affect the daily lives of billions of people. It remains to be seen how this story will affect public trust in the tech giant and what the long-term implications will be for the SEO and digital marketing industry.