{"id":36472,"date":"2026-07-22T09:23:33","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T08:23:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/?p=36472"},"modified":"2026-07-22T09:23:33","modified_gmt":"2026-07-22T08:23:33","slug":"what-changes-from-august-2-2026-to-the-new-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/what-changes-from-august-2-2026-to-the-new-rules\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Act: What&#039;s changing starting August 2, 2026? New rules for businesses, chatbots, and AI-generated content."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Many companies already use artificial intelligence to respond to customers, create images, write texts, analyze data, or automate business tasks. The problem is that these tools were often introduced without considering who controls the results, how users are informed, and who responds in the event of errors.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From the <\/span><b>August 2, 2026<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> This informal management becomes much riskier. The transparency obligations set forth in Article 50 of the AI Act, the European regulation on artificial intelligence, come into force. People will need to be able to recognize when they are interacting with an automatic system and when content has been artificially generated or modified.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The change isn&#039;t just about big tech platforms. It can involve businesses, professionals, e-commerce sites, publishers, agencies, public bodies, and organizations using chatbots, voice assistants, content generators, biometric systems, or emotion recognition tools.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The real question, therefore, is no longer just: <\/span><b>\u201cAre we using artificial intelligence?\u201d<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AND: <\/span><b>\u201cDo people know when we\u2019re using it, and does anyone actually monitor what they produce?\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n<h2><b>What is the AI Act?<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The AI Act, formally EU Regulation 2024\/1689, is the European legislation that governs the development, distribution, and use of artificial intelligence systems.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The regulation follows a risk-based approach. It does not treat all applications equally, but introduces different obligations depending on the impact a system may have on people, security, and fundamental rights.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Applications considered minimally risky remain largely exempt from specific requirements. For systems with risks of manipulation, poor transparency, or significant impacts on individuals, however, controls, mandatory reporting, and more specific responsibilities are introduced.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The goal isn&#039;t to prevent companies from using artificial intelligence. It&#039;s to prevent it from being used in an invisible, uncontrolled, or potentially deceptive way.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Why August 2, 2026, is a crucial date<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The AI Act came into effect on August 1, 2024, but its implementation has been staggered.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Prohibitions on certain practices deemed unacceptable and AI literacy requirements became applicable on February 2, 2025. Other provisions, including those regarding general-purpose AI models, began to apply on August 2, 2025.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The <\/span><b>August 2, 2026<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> However, a much broader scope of the regulation will come into force. Among the most significant changes for businesses and professionals are the transparency obligations of Article 50, the rules relating to numerous high-risk systems, and new control and enforcement powers. However, some provisions will continue to follow later deadlines, particularly for certain categories of high-risk systems. Therefore, it is not entirely correct to state that the entire AI Act will be fully applicable from that date.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The date remains a watershed moment: using AI without knowing where it is being used, what content it produces, and how it is communicated to users will no longer be simply a matter of internal disorganization.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The central principle: People must know when AI intervenes<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The most obvious change concerns people&#039;s right to understand when they are interacting with an automated system or when they are faced with artificially generated content.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Article 50 distinguishes between <\/span><b>suppliers<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, that is, those who develop or make available certain systems, and <\/span><b>professional users<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, defined by the regulation as deployers, i.e. companies and organizations that use those systems in their activities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Obligations vary based on the role. Those who provide a system must design it compliantly. Those who use it must verify how it is used, inform people when necessary, and maintain concrete accountability for the results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Using software developed by another company, therefore, does not automatically eliminate all liability.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Chatbots and virtual assistants will have to declare themselves<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When a person interacts directly with an AI system, they must be clearly informed of the automatic nature of the interaction, unless this is already obvious from the circumstances.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The rule may concern:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">chatbots installed on websites;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">virtual assistants for customer service;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">voice systems for reservations and switchboards;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">automated agents used in sales;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">tools that perform an initial selection of requests;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">digital assistants integrated into portals and applications.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It shouldn&#039;t take you to the end of the conversation to realize you weren&#039;t talking to someone. The information should be understandable and presented at a useful time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For businesses, this means checking initial messages, screenshots, voice recordings, support paths, and handoffs to a human agent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The problem isn&#039;t using a chatbot. It&#039;s making the user think they&#039;re talking to a person when they&#039;re not.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Generated images, audio, video and text must be recognizable<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Providers of systems that generate or modify synthetic content will have to use technical solutions that make such content detectable as artificial.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The marking must be machine-readable, interoperable, effective, and technically reliable. It may therefore take the form of metadata, digital watermarks, or other identification systems embedded in the content.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This obligation falls primarily on system providers, but companies integrating them into their processes must also be cautious. Content can be cropped, compressed, modified, exported, or uploaded to a platform that eliminates part of the original information.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Before using an image, audio, or video generator, it&#039;s not enough to ask yourself how realistic the result is. It&#039;s worth checking:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">if the system applies a marking;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">what type of marking does it use;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">if it remains present after export;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">if it can be removed during subsequent modifications;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What information does the manufacturer provide on compliance.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Creating content is easy. Proving its origin and proper management can be much more difficult.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Deepfake: When Labeling Becomes Mandatory<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-36476 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/deepfake.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1920\" height=\"1080\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/deepfake.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/www.digife.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/deepfake-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.digife.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/deepfake-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.digife.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/deepfake-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.digife.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/deepfake-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.digife.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/deepfake-18x10.jpg 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px\" \/><\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The AI Act defines <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ibm.com\/it-it\/think\/x-force\/weaponizing-reality-evolution-deepfake-technology\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">deepfake<\/a> audio, video, or visual content generated or manipulated by artificial intelligence that represents existing people, objects, places, entities, or events and may appear falsely authentic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anyone using a system to create or modify this type of content must clearly state that the material has been artificially generated or manipulated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The topic includes advertising campaigns, political communications, informational content, corporate videos, realistic reconstructions, concise testimonies, and materials published on social media.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For artistic, satirical, creative, or fictional works, more flexible arrangements are provided so as not to compromise the experience of the work. Transparency, however, does not disappear completely.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It&#039;s not enough to simply include a hidden text in the description or at the bottom of a page. Communication must be clear, visible, and appropriate for the medium used.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The European Commission has also made specific icons available to flag artificially generated content. Their use is optional, while the obligation to provide information remains mandatory in the cases provided for.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Articles and content of public interest: not everything AI writes needs to be declared<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One of the most sensitive issues concerns texts generated or manipulated by artificial intelligence and published to inform the public on topics of general interest.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In these cases, the use of AI must be declared, unless the content has undergone a human review process or editorial control and a person or organization takes responsibility for its publication.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This step is crucial because it avoids a widespread simplification: from August 2, 2026, it will no longer be necessary to indiscriminately write &quot;AI-generated content&quot; under any text in which an automatic tool has been used.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It&#039;s how AI is used that matters.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An article produced automatically and published without review presents a different problem than a text in which artificial intelligence has been used as an aid, but which has been checked, corrected and approved by an editorial manager.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Compliance will therefore not depend solely on the tool used. It will depend on the existence of a real control process.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Emotion recognition and biometric categorization<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Transparency obligations also apply to systems that analyze biometric characteristics or claim to recognize people&#039;s emotions and states.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Those who use these tools must inform those exposed to their operation. This obligation may apply both when the analysis occurs in real time and when it is performed subsequently on recordings or collected data.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Applications may include:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">workplaces;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">shops and shopping centers;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">events;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">security systems;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">customer analysis;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">personnel selection and management;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">services accessible to the public.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The disclosure required by the AI Act does not replace privacy obligations. If the system processes personal or biometric data, the company must also verify its compatibility with the GDPR and other applicable regulations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Just because a technology is available on the market does not mean it can be used for any purpose.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Who has to adapt<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The obligations do not only concern those who develop complex artificial intelligence models.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Organizations using systems purchased from third parties or integrated into their own processes must also be cautious. Potentially affected entities include companies, professionals, agencies, publishers, e-commerce sites, public bodies, digital platforms, and companies that automate customer, user, or employee interactions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first mistake to avoid is to think: <\/span><b>\u201cWe didn\u2019t develop the system, so it doesn\u2019t concern us.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A company may be a supplier in one project, a professional user in another, and part of a broader chain in a third. To understand the obligations, it&#039;s first necessary to identify the role it plays in each case.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>What companies actually need to do<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To prepare for August 2, 2026, it&#039;s not enough to add a generic statement to your privacy policy. We need to reconstruct where and how artificial intelligence actually enters into business processes.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>1. Map all the tools used<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">It is necessary to census chatbots, text generators, creative platforms, voice systems, analytics tools, and AI functions integrated into software and services used by employees.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Even seemingly secondary functions can produce relevant content, decisions, or interactions.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>2. Distinguish the role of the company<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For each system, it is necessary to establish whether the organization is a supplier, integrator, distributor, or professional user.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Without this distinction, it is difficult to understand which obligations fall on the company and which on the producer.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>3. Check interfaces and messages<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Chatbots, voice assistants, and automated agents must clearly inform the user when the interaction is taking place with an AI system.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The message must appear at the right time, not be hidden in general conditions that no one consults during use.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>4. Check supplier markings and functionality<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Companies using generative tools should ask producers what markup and detection systems are applied to the content.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Generic acceptance of the terms of a software does not mean that you have verified its compliance.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>5. Define who controls and approves<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When AI produces text, images, analyses, or responses intended for the public, it must be clear who performs the final check.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe system created it\u201d is not a procedure and does not eliminate the organization\u2019s responsibility.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>6. Maintain evidence of audits<\/b><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Internal policies, instrument logs, operating instructions, audits performed, and assigned responsibilities help demonstrate that AI is not being used unregulated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Compliance isn&#039;t just about doing the right thing. It&#039;s also about being able to demonstrate how it was done.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The European Code of Conduct can help, but it does not replace the law<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The European Commission has published a Code of Conduct on the transparency of AI-generated content.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Participation is voluntary, but it can help suppliers and users demonstrate compliance with content marking and labeling requirements. Those who choose not to participate must still be able to demonstrate that the alternative solutions adopted are adequate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Code does not replace the AI Act and does not automatically make every system compliant. However, it provides a common framework for applying the rules more predictably.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Is there an extension until December 2, 2026?<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Particular attention is needed on this point.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Article 50 applies from <\/span><b>August 2, 2026<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and, generally, from that date, suppliers and users must comply with transparency obligations. The Commission specifies that a possible transitional period concerns only the technical marking and detection requirement set out in Article 50, paragraph 2, for certain systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The modification foreseen by the AI Omnibus agreed at European level envisages, for these existing systems, an adaptation within the <\/span><b>December 2, 2026<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. At the moment, however, the application of this provision remains tied to the final adoption of the regulatory amendment. Therefore, it is not a general extension for chatbots, deepfakes, information notices, or content published without editorial control.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Using this potential transition as a reason to postpone the entire adjustment would be a mistake.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>The sanctions provided for by the AI Act<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For violations other than those related to prohibited practices, the AI Act provides for penalties that can reach up to <\/span><b>15 million euros<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> or to the <\/span><b>3% of total annual worldwide turnover<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of the previous financial year, if higher.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The regulation provides specific criteria and thresholds, with application proportionate to the size of the company.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fines, however, are not the only risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A chatbot that doesn&#039;t disclose its nature, an unverified article, a synthetic image presented as authentic, or an incorrect automatic response can also cause reputational damage, contractual disputes, customer problems, and professional liability.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Transparency isn&#039;t just about avoiding fines. It&#039;s about ensuring people&#039;s trust isn&#039;t lost when they discover AI has been used covertly or uncontrolled.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>Real change isn&#039;t putting a label on something.<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reducing the AI Act to just \u201cartificially intelligent content\u201d misses the point of the legislation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The change affects the entire chain of responsibility: those who choose the tool, those who monitor its functioning, those who verify the results, those who inform people and those who respond when something doesn&#039;t work.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A label can make content transparent. It can&#039;t correct an uncontrolled process.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">From August 2, 2026, companies will have to demonstrate that they understand the artificial intelligence they use, not just that they have purchased or activated it.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><b>How to prepare for August 2, 2026<\/b><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The starting point isn&#039;t to eliminate AI tools. It&#039;s to stop using them without a comprehensive vision.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Before the deadline, each organization should be able to accurately answer a few questions:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Where is AI used?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Who authorized those tools?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Do people know when they are interacting with an automated system?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Is the generated content recognizable?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Does anyone check texts, images, and responses before publishing?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Is there anyone responsible when the system fails?<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Have suppliers provided sufficient compliance information?<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If the answers aren&#039;t clear, the problem isn&#039;t just regulatory. It means that part of the business&#039;s operations are being entrusted to systems the organization doesn&#039;t truly govern.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Artificial intelligence can speed up processes. But uncontrolled speed also makes errors more likely.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>It&#039;s not enough to use AI. You need to know where it operates, what it produces, and who is responsible for it.<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If your company uses chatbots, generative tools, or automation but hasn&#039;t yet mapped out how they fit into processes, the first step isn&#039;t adding a label. It&#039;s understanding where AI communicates, makes decisions, or produces content instead of people.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/contacts\/\"><strong>Contact Digife:<\/strong><\/a> we analyze the tools used, the points of contact with users and the publishing processes, to identify where they are lacking <strong>transparency<\/strong>, <strong>check<\/strong> is <strong>responsibility.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Molte aziende utilizzano gi\u00e0 l\u2019intelligenza artificiale per rispondere ai clienti, creare immagini, scrivere testi, analizzare dati o automatizzare attivit\u00e0 commerciali. Il problema \u00e8 che spesso questi strumenti sono stati introdotti&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":37,"featured_media":36475,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-notizie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/37"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36472"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36478,"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36472\/revisions\/36478"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.digife.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}